![]() |
|
||
Postgrad Research : Linus Lim PhD Project >>Background | Specimen Details | Parties Involved | Pictures of slab construction
|
|
Figure 1: Full scale fire test in the Cardington steel building (Newman et al., 2000) |
Figure 2: Large deflections suffered by the composite slabs without collapse (Newman et al., 2000) |
Tensile membrane action can occur in slabs with fixed or simply supported edge conditions and occurs when the slabs undergo large deflections. If a simply supported slab undergoes relatively large deflections, the regions of the slab on the supports start to move inwards but are restrained by the adjacent outer regions. This creates a compressive ring around the outside edges of the slabs balanced by tensile membrane forces in the middle of the slab. If the reinforcing mesh fractures, the slab will fail as the tensile field cannot be sustained.
|
Figure 3: Slab bridging between supports by tensile membrane action (Newman et al., 2000)
|
|
Figure 4: Mechanism of tensile membrane action (Newman et al., 2000) |
In another series of tests conducted under ambient temperatures at the Building Research Establishment (BRE), a two way spanning simply supported composite slab with no in-plane horizontal restraint at its edges has carried loads considerably in excess of those predicted by conventional yield line design principles (Bailey, 2000). This is a fairly recent discovery in the rapidly evolving fire research industry.
Based on these tests, Bailey (2000) has developed a method for determining the ultimate load carrying capacity of slabs incorporating the effects of tensile membrane enhancement. This method has been extrapolated to tentatively predict the response of composite slabs in fire and applied to the fire tests undertaken on the 8 storey steel framed test building at the Cardington Large Building Test Facility in 1995/1996. The postulated membrane behaviour is not yet fully understood, especially at elevated temperatures. Newman et al.(2000) have applied the tensile membrane procedure to a limited range of conditions involving low to moderate fire severity, in which the influence of elevated temperatures on the components is expected to be minor. Clifton et al. (2001) have extended this design method for application in New Zealand, taking account the effect of elevated temperatures in the load resisting components and the strength contribution of the secondary beams to the slabs. These proposed design methods have yet to be verified with a fire test, which is one of the principal objectives of these tests.
Bailey, C.G. (2000) Design of Steel Structures with Composite Slabs at the Fire Limit State, Final Report. Building Research Establishment. U.K.
Clifton, G.C., Hinderhofer, M.D., and Schmid, R. (2001) Design of Multi-Storey Steel Framed Buildings with Unprotected Secondary beams or joists for Dependable Inelastic Response in Severe Fires. HERA Steel Design and Construction Bulletin No. 60, HERA, Manukau City, New Zealand.
Concrete Structures Standard (1995) NZS 3101: Part1: 1995. The Design of Concrete Structures, Standards New Zealand, Wellington.
Newman, G.M., Robinson, J.T. and Bailey, C.G. (2000) Fire Safe Design: A New Approach to Multi-Story Steel-Framed Buildings. The Steel Construction Institute, Berkshire, U.K.